For the lovely folks at The American Conservative, I reviewed a new book on Native American history called Indigenous Continent. You should read it over there, while it’s out from the paywall.
It’s a bit strange that the eminence grise on Native American history is a Finn named Pekka Hämäläinen who teaches at Oxford, but he is the man, garnering a profile in the NYT recently (how often does that happen to academic historians?). Indigenous Continent leverages that status to make a quite revisionist argument: that Native nations and empires successfully resisted colonial incursions, and did plenty of colonizing of their own, until almost the 20th century.
Hämäläinen does a mixed job of proving his case - in my view, it’s too broad of an argument, although it holds up for specific Native empires (the Iriquois, Lakota/Sioux, and Comanche chief among them). If you’re interested in Native American history, I’d recommend his previous opus, Lakota America, which I also reviewed: it’s sharper.
In related news, the USDA is trialing a fix to the food stamp equivalent program on Native reservations, which is great.
I also wrote a section of this newsletter about the “were there already horses in America when colonists arrived"?” debate, but Google Docs lost it, along with a fantastic links section. I remind myself that God is good everyday and everyday God is good.
The TLDR: conventional wisdom has held horses originally evolved in North America, but crossed the Bering land bridge into Eurasia and disappeared until the arrival of the Spanish. Hämäläinen bases much of his theory on this conventional wisdom, arguing that the arrival of the horse transformed the technological basis of indigenous empires, enabling force projection over astonishing distance. He describes his grand research project as “exploring the role of expansionist equestrian regimes in world history.”
But some recent historiography and archaeology claims that horses were here the whole time, and that conventional wisdom is a colonial imposition. I’m not qualified to judge the claims, but if true they pose major problems for Indigenous Continent.
Reading
Why did autofiction happen, and how can we kill it?
“Wombats were the most beautiful of God’s creatures,” thought the pre-Raphaelites. Here’s a 1904 sketch by Edward Burne-Jones of a wombat at the pyramids.
Thanks Omar for passing along this little animated comic that perfectly, uncannily captures the feeling of falling asleep in the back of your parents’ car on a road trip.
The Thirty-Six Twitter Strategems. This is so good, no notes.
Endeavors
Two friends are starting new projects aimed at helping young founders (corporate and otherwise). Both are stellar individuals who have thought very deeply about how to support young talent.
Arnaud Schenk of Entrepeneur First is starting the Polaris Fellowship:
And Molly Mielke is kicking off Moth Fund:
Both are cool parallels to the work we do at Interact, although they’re both their own unique endeavors.
Excellent, thanks. The Harpers review of Indigenous Continent is also quite good:
https://harpers.org/archive/2022/11/contest-or-conquest-indigenous-continent-the-epic-contest-for-north-america-pekka-hamalainen-provocative-history/